Anwalt Deutschland Fachanwalt deutsch German Lawyer Germany English language Attorney-at-law English Lawyer germany french advocat francais allemagneFrench Attorney in Germany spanish language abogado alemania Spanish Attorney/ Lawyer in Germany Italian language avvocatto germania Italian Lawyer/ Attorney Germany Portuguese language advogado Alemanha Portuguese Polish speaking Lawyer/ Attorney in Germany adwokat Niemcy Polish Japanese speaking Lawyer/ Attorney in Germany Bengoshi Doitsu Japanese Attorney/ Lawyer Vietnamese language luat suVietnamese Korean speaking lawyer/ attorney in Germany, EuropeKorean Chinese language Lawyer/ Attorney in Germany/ EuropeChinese Lawyer/ Attorney russian speaking advokat Germaniya Russian

 

Attorney-at-Law Michael Horak, graduate engineer (Electrical Engineering), LL.M. (European Law) Julia Ziegeler, Attorney-at-law Attorney Umberg, LL.M., M.A. Andree Eckhard, Patent Attorney Katharina Gitmann, Attorney-at-law Karoline Behrend, Attorney-at-law Johanna K. Müller-Kühne, PhD, Patent Attorney Andreas Friedlein, Attorney-at-law Stefan Karfusehr, Attorney-at-law

horak.
Attorneys at law

 

 

Locations  Berlin  Bielefeld  Bremen  Düsseldorf  Frankfurt  Hamburg  Hanover  Munich  Stuttgart  Vienna
Overview  Practice  IP Law  Patent Law  Trademark Law  Law Office  Trademark Application  Patent filer  Sample Texts  German Acts  Court Rulings  Contact  Imprint  Privacy Policy  Links
ip attorney germany lawyer attorney law office germany german law european law patent law design law trademark law copyright law german law ip specialist media law music law film law event law entertainment law contracts license agreement draft contract under german law  hannover prosecution infringement patent trade name copyright reseller contract attorney patent law  utility model law unfair competition law anti trust lawyer
file trdaemark application patent application design application lawyer patent trademark attorney trademark searches similiarity search opposition file an infingement suit germany german attorney ip specialist copyright specialist food law plant law patent lawyer domain law internet law it law computer law

patents-trademarks-copyright-europe law lawyer german law german lawyer german attorney trade mark law patent law utility model law design law

ip-lawyer it lawyer attorney for patents trade specialist ip attorney  marks germany european lawyer trademark european community mark ct ect law europen patent office germany representation

ohim euipo representative german patent office munich lawyer germany ip attorney patent lawyer trademark lawyer patent attorney german patent attorney epo eurpean patent office reprsentation law firm european patent german patent austrian patent office intellectual property design lawyer copyright law trademark law patent attorney trademark attorney design attorney

... Start ... Overview ... Practice ... Company Law ... Plc Law ... Small Stock Company
Start
General Terms and Conditions
Overview
Law Office
Jobs
Attorneys Fees
Michael Horak, LL.M., Attorney-at-law
Julia Ziegeler, Attorney-at-law
Anna Umberg, LL.M., M.A., Attorney-at-law
Andree Eckhard, Patent Attorney
Katharina Gitmann, Attorney-at-law
Karoline Behrend, Attorney-at-law
Johanna K. Müller-Kühne, PhD, Patent Attorney
Andreas Friedlein, Attorney-at-law
Stefan Karfusehr, Attorney-at-law
Practice
IP Law
Patent Law
Patent Application
Utility Model Law
Design Law
Trademark Law
Domain Law
Semiconductor Topographies
Plant Varieties and Seeds
Know-How Law
Copyright Law
Forms
Licence Law
Computer Law
Online Law
E-Commerce
E-Contract
Software Law
Media Law
Antitrust Law
Advertising Law
Competition Law
EC Competition Law
Vergleich
Admonishment
Admonishment-Sample
Foodstuffs Law
Pharmaceutical Law
Telecommunications Law
Commercial Law
Company Law
Plc Law
Small Stock Company
International Law
IR-Trademarks
Public Procurement Law
Fiscal and Economic Offences Law
Research
IP Search
IP Monitoring
Domain Research
Economic Research
Information Brokerage
Sample Texts
Forms and Sample Agreements
Confidentiality Agreement
Memorandum of Association
Contractual Clauses
Jurisdiction Clause
Return Right
German Acts
Patent Act
Trademark Act
Copyright Act
Employee Inventions Law
Competition Act
Teleservices Act
Court Rulings
Patent law
BGH-software-patent
Trademark law
BGH-Bonus2
BGH-ac-pharma
BGH-Blendaxpep
BGH-Acceleration-fee
BGH-Fuenfer
OLGFFM-alcon.de
BGH-LOGO
KG-toolshop
Trademark Orange
ECFI-Aurelia
Competition law
BGH-answer-obligation
BGH-Handy for 0
BVerfG-Benetton
OLG-Celle-anwalt-hannover-de
Computer Law
Mitwohnzent
OLGHH-stockexchangedata
OLGHH-Kulturwerbung.de
BGH-Mitwohnzentrale
BGH-Maxem
BGH-Paperboy
Food law
OLGCelle 13O320aus98
Copyright law
BGH-Urteil-Marlene Dietrich
OLGBS-Beschwerdewert-Auskunft
ECJ-Sony Falcon
Antitrust Law
BGH-Hörgeräteakustik
Employment Law
Attorneys Ethics law
AnwG-Taetigkeitsschwerpunkt
OLGStuttgart-Vanity-Nummer
BVerfG1BvR335aus97
Pharmaceutical Law
Telecommunications Law
inter
Contact
Enquiry
Power of Attorney
Download
Imprint
Privacy Policy
Links
Associations
Official Authorities
Universities
Legal Issues
Miscellaneous
Locations
Berlin
Bielefeld
Bremen
Düsseldorf
Frankfurt
Hamburg
Hanover
Munich
Stuttgart
Vienna

 

horak.
Attorneys at Law Hannover
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Georgstr. 48
30159 Hannover (Headquarter)
Germany
Fon +49 511.35 73 56-0
Fax +49 511.35 73 56-29
info@iprecht.de  
hannover@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Berlin
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Wittestraße 30 K
13509 Berlin
Germany
Fon +49 30.403 66 69-00
Fax +49 30.403 66 69-09
berlin@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Bielefeld
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Herforder Str. 69
33602 Bielefeld
Germany
Fon +49 521.43 06 06-60
Fax +49 521.43 06 06-69
bielefeld@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Bremen
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Parkallee 117
28209 Bremen
Germany
Fon +49 421.33 11 12-90
Fax +49 421.33 11 12-99
bremen@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Düsseldorf
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Grafenberger Allee 293
40237 Düsseldorf
Germany
Fon +49 211.97 26 95-00
Fax +49 211.97 26 95-09
duesseldorf@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Frankfurt/ Main
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Alfred-Herrhausen-Allee 3-5
65760 Frankfurt-Eschborn
Germany
Fon +49 69.380 79 74-20
Fax +49 69.380 79 74-29
frankfurt@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Hamburg
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Colonnaden 5
20354 Hamburg
Germany
Fon +49 40.882 15 83-10
Fax +49 40.882 15 83-19
hamburg@iprecht.de
 
horak. 
Attorneys at Law Munich
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Landsberger Str. 155
80687 Munich
Germany

Fon +49 89.250 07 90-50
Fax +49 89.250 07 90-59
munich@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Stuttgart
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Königstraße 80
70173 Stuttgart
Germany
Fon +49 711.99 58 55-90
Fax +49 711.99 58 55-99
stuttgart@iprecht.de
 
horak. 
Patent Attorneys Vienna
 
Trauttmansdorffgasse 8
1130 Vienna
Austria
Fon +43 1.876 15 17
Fax +49 511.35 73 56-29
vienna@iprecht.de

 

The small stock company

  • General information
  • Continuity of an enterprise
  • Going publicGoing public

The middle-sized stock company

Middle-sized enterprises usually take the corporate form of the limited liability company (GmbH) or of the limited liability company and limited partnership (GmbH & Co. KG). Apart from the high prestige enjoyed by the stock company and the possibility of succession of ownership, the so-called “small stock company” is actually structured on equal terms as the limited liability company. Moreover, it offers many advantages due to a theoretically unlimited possibility to raise capital by selling shares on the stock market.

Already before the “stock fever” started, middle-sized enterprises have enjoyed very favourable opportunities of raising equity capital by changing the corporate form into a small stock company. This form of raising capital lets middle-sized enterprises exploit all advantages of the stock company while avoiding the uncomfortable issues relating to credits and loans which are often granted or allowed against a security in the case of limited liability company.

The initial reservations which middle-sized enterprises used to have against taking the form of a stock company (due to the then mandatory participation of workers’ representatives in the supervisory board) have meanwhile been dispelled by changes in law. The requirement for the employees’ codetermination does not apply to enterprises whose number of employees lies below 500, which is also the case for the limited liability company. On the other hand, the advantages of the profit-sharing plan (Mitarbeiterbeteiligung) and corporate loyalty programmes (Mitarbeiterbindung) are now easier to achieve, for instance by means of an employee benefit plan through which the employees receive a share of the profits of the business. Moreover, the mere effect of the word “stock company” makes an enterprise with this corporate form more attractive to executive staff; “managing board” or “spokesman of the managing board” are positions which not only sound as if their denomination implied responsibility but they do imply it indeed.

Enterprise continuity (Unternehmenskontinuität)

Succession of ownership, especially the transfer of shares to the following generations, accounts for continuity of the enterprise. As a result, the prospective decedent at first continues to control the strategic part of the business in the position of the president of the supervisory board, and thus he can further accompany his life’s work while passing on his experiences. A question regarding the nomenclature arises in this context, i.e. if the founder of an enterprise should carry the title “president of the supervisory board” or – as is the case with the limited liability company – should he be a member of “the advisory council” (Beirat).

Going public

The most relevant economical advantage of a small stock company as compared to a limited liability company is the possibility to raise capital by selling shares on the stock market. Nevertheless, going public is quite a complicated process, which must be preceded by comprehensive preparations. Apart from legal issues, numerous fiscal matters have to be considered. Other questions also arise, for instance in which of the four market segments of the stock market the initial public offering (IPO) should take place (Official Market, Regulated Market, Neuer Markt and Regulated Unofficial Market). Moreover, business valuation shall be necessary in the course of going public in order to determine the value of a share. However, as soon as the above-mentioned obstacles have been overcome, there are no limits to capital issues and to increasing share capital.

Already the first step, the conversion of a middle-sized enterprise into a stock company, involves many uncertainties. Although company law contains numerous formal requirements, those applicable to the “small” stock company are generally similar to those applicable to the limited liability company. What’s more, the new Act regulating the Transformation of Companies (Umwandlungsgesetz) makes the conversion of the legal form easier. However, both the transformation and the initial public offering of the company cause considerable costs in the beginning which, however, do pay off in the long run.

The minimum share capital of the small stock company is Euro 50,000. One person is enough to found the small stock company and he can hold all shares in the beginning.

The memorandum of association must be recorded in the notarial form when converting the form of a company and when founding a company. The founders elect the first auditors and the supervisory board who in turn appoints the board of directors and the shareholders’ meeting. The founders deliver a written incorporation report that the supervisory board and the board of directors scrutinize to determine whether all conditions for a proper incorporation have been met. In some cases the court appoints independent auditors to verify the report. Then the founders, the supervisory board and the board of directors apply to the local commercial register for registration.

To sum up, the middle-sized stock company in the form of the “small PLC” provides a sensible solution for raising and maintaining capital in the long run. Introduction to the stock market provides for capital increase and consequently for an increase of the equity ratio and of the credit worthiness. At the same time, the shareholders or the owners of the enterprise can keep their independence by means of appropriate strategic planning. Another advantage involves employees’ loyalty.

 

ip-attorney-ip-lawyer german law german lawyer patent law patent application file patent lawyer print trademark-law-patent-domain-design-utility-model-europe design law eu design community design law design right international design save law-of-technics-multi-media-law-german-business-lawyerback european-trademark-protection-german-trademarks-european-lawenquiry