Anwalt Deutschland Fachanwalt deutsch German Lawyer Germany English language Attorney-at-law English Lawyer germany french advocat francais allemagneFrench Attorney in Germany spanish language abogado alemania Spanish Attorney/ Lawyer in Germany Italian language avvocatto germania Italian Lawyer/ Attorney Germany Portuguese language advogado Alemanha Portuguese Polish speaking Lawyer/ Attorney in Germany adwokat Niemcy Polish Japanese speaking Lawyer/ Attorney in Germany Bengoshi Doitsu Japanese Attorney/ Lawyer Vietnamese language luat suVietnamese Korean speaking lawyer/ attorney in Germany, EuropeKorean Chinese language Lawyer/ Attorney in Germany/ EuropeChinese Lawyer/ Attorney russian speaking advokat Germaniya Russian


Attorney-at-Law Michael Horak, graduate engineer (Electrical Engineering), LL.M. (European Law) Julia Ziegeler, Attorney-at-law Attorney Umberg, LL.M., M.A. Andree Eckhard, Patent Attorney Katharina Gitmann, Attorney-at-law Karoline Behrend, Attorney-at-law Johanna K. Müller-Kühne, PhD, Patent Attorney Andreas Friedlein, Attorney-at-law John Bühler, Attorney-at-law

Attorneys at law



Locations  Berlin  Bielefeld  Bremen  Düsseldorf  Frankfurt  Hamburg  Hanover  Munich  Stuttgart  Vienna
Overview  Practice  IP Law  Patent Law  Trademark Law  Law Office  Trademark Application  Patent filer  Sample Texts  German Acts  Court Rulings  Contact  Imprint  Privacy Policy  Links
ip attorney germany lawyer attorney law office germany german law european law patent law design law trademark law copyright law german law ip specialist media law music law film law event law entertainment law contracts license agreement draft contract under german law  hannover prosecution infringement patent trade name copyright reseller contract attorney patent law  utility model law unfair competition law anti trust lawyer
file trdaemark application patent application design application lawyer patent trademark attorney trademark searches similiarity search opposition file an infingement suit germany german attorney ip specialist copyright specialist food law plant law patent lawyer domain law internet law it law computer law

patents-trademarks-copyright-europe law lawyer german law german lawyer german attorney trade mark law patent law utility model law design law

ip-lawyer it lawyer attorney for patents trade specialist ip attorney  marks germany european lawyer trademark european community mark ct ect law europen patent office germany representation

ohim euipo representative german patent office munich lawyer germany ip attorney patent lawyer trademark lawyer patent attorney german patent attorney epo eurpean patent office reprsentation law firm european patent german patent austrian patent office intellectual property design lawyer copyright law trademark law patent attorney trademark attorney design attorney

... Start ... Overview ... Court Rulings ... Computer Law ... Mitwohnzent

The judgement of the Regional Appeal Court in Hamburg of 13th July 1999 – Reference No.: 3 U 58/98 – “Mitwohnzentrale”

The plaintiffs, an association of 40 German short-term letting agencies had registered a domain The defendants, also an association of 25 other letting agencies, had registered with Deutsche Network Information Centre (DENIC) the domain name "". Mitwohnzentrale is a common expression that consumers associate with this type of service and the use of this term by an organisation that only consists of part of the sector could lead to a substantial risk of an unfair competitive distortion. The plaintiffs sought against the defendants an injunction to disallow their domain name. The Regional Court in Hamburg held for the plaintiff, and the Regional Appeal Court in Hamburg upheld the decision.

The court held that the use of the generic term "Mitwohnzentrale" as a domain name violates § 1 of the Unfair Competition Act, which states that any detracting from business activity of any competitor through measures of unfair competition caused by another competitor is a restraint of trade, and therefore unlawful. Thus, the plaintiffs are effectively excluded from business in the internet. The court reasoned that consumers, who often search information in the internet by guessing simple common words as domain names for services or goods are "caught" by the use of generic terms as domain names. A domain name like "Mitwohnzentrale" guides consumer to the corresponding registered domain address, and if satisfied with what they find on such a site consumers would not search for additional vendors even if they realise that the site does not provide a complete list of short-term letting agencies in Germany. The court held that the vendor with the generic term enjoys an advantage because the term simply channels consumers to only one site and keeps competitors from enjoying the fruit of their labour in violation of § 1 of the Unfair Competition Act. Furthermore, in order to prevent the use of common expressions as domain names, the court argued that a generic term can be neither a trademark nor a domain name under the German Trademark Act (see § 8 (2) of the Trademark Act).

© 1998-2021 IP Attorney at law Michael Horak, LL.M, Certified IP Law Specialist

ip-attorney-ip-lawyer german law german lawyer patent law patent application file patent lawyer print trademark-law-patent-domain-design-utility-model-europe design law eu design community design law design right international design save law-of-technics-multi-media-law-german-business-lawyerback european-trademark-protection-german-trademarks-european-lawenquiry