Anwalt Deutschland Fachanwalt deutsch German Lawyer Germany English language Attorney-at-law English Lawyer germany french advocat francais allemagneFrench Attorney in Germany spanish language abogado alemania Spanish Attorney/ Lawyer in Germany Italian language avvocatto germania Italian Lawyer/ Attorney Germany Portuguese language advogado Alemanha Portuguese Polish speaking Lawyer/ Attorney in Germany adwokat Niemcy Polish Japanese speaking Lawyer/ Attorney in Germany Bengoshi Doitsu Japanese Attorney/ Lawyer Vietnamese language luat suVietnamese Korean speaking lawyer/ attorney in Germany, EuropeKorean Chinese language Lawyer/ Attorney in Germany/ EuropeChinese Lawyer/ Attorney russian speaking advokat Germaniya Russian

 

Attorney-at-Law Michael Horak, graduate engineer (Electrical Engineering), LL.M. (European Law) Julia Ziegeler, Attorney-at-law Attorney Umberg, LL.M., M.A. Andree Eckhard, Patent Attorney Katharina Gitmann, Attorney-at-law Karoline Behrend, Attorney-at-law Johanna K. Müller-Kühne, PhD, Patent Attorney Andreas Friedlein, Attorney-at-law Stefan Karfusehr, Attorney-at-law

horak.
Attorneys at law

 

 

Locations  Berlin  Bielefeld  Bremen  Düsseldorf  Frankfurt  Hamburg  Hanover  Munich  Stuttgart  Vienna
Overview  Practice  IP Law  Patent Law  Trademark Law  Law Office  Trademark Application  Patent filer  Sample Texts  German Acts  Court Rulings  Contact  Imprint  Privacy Policy  Links
ip attorney germany lawyer attorney law office germany german law european law patent law design law trademark law copyright law german law ip specialist media law music law film law event law entertainment law contracts license agreement draft contract under german law  hannover prosecution infringement patent trade name copyright reseller contract attorney patent law  utility model law unfair competition law anti trust lawyer
file trdaemark application patent application design application lawyer patent trademark attorney trademark searches similiarity search opposition file an infingement suit germany german attorney ip specialist copyright specialist food law plant law patent lawyer domain law internet law it law computer law

patents-trademarks-copyright-europe law lawyer german law german lawyer german attorney trade mark law patent law utility model law design law

ip-lawyer it lawyer attorney for patents trade specialist ip attorney  marks germany european lawyer trademark european community mark ct ect law europen patent office germany representation

ohim euipo representative german patent office munich lawyer germany ip attorney patent lawyer trademark lawyer patent attorney german patent attorney epo eurpean patent office reprsentation law firm european patent german patent austrian patent office intellectual property design lawyer copyright law trademark law patent attorney trademark attorney design attorney

... Start ... Overview ... Sample Texts ... Forms and Sample Agreements ... Memorandum of Association
Start
General Terms and Conditions
Overview
Law Office
Jobs
Attorneys Fees
Michael Horak, LL.M., Attorney-at-law
Julia Ziegeler, Attorney-at-law
Anna Umberg, LL.M., M.A., Attorney-at-law
Andree Eckhard, Patent Attorney
Katharina Gitmann, Attorney-at-law
Karoline Behrend, Attorney-at-law
Johanna K. Müller-Kühne, PhD, Patent Attorney
Andreas Friedlein, Attorney-at-law
Stefan Karfusehr, Attorney-at-law
Practice
IP Law
Patent Law
Patent Application
Utility Model Law
Design Law
Trademark Law
Domain Law
Semiconductor Topographies
Plant Varieties and Seeds
Know-How Law
Copyright Law
Forms
Licence Law
Computer Law
Online Law
E-Commerce
E-Contract
Software Law
Media Law
Antitrust Law
Advertising Law
Competition Law
EC Competition Law
Vergleich
Admonishment
Admonishment-Sample
Foodstuffs Law
Pharmaceutical Law
Telecommunications Law
Commercial Law
Company Law
Plc Law
Small Stock Company
International Law
IR-Trademarks
Public Procurement Law
Fiscal and Economic Offences Law
Research
IP Search
IP Monitoring
Domain Research
Economic Research
Information Brokerage
Sample Texts
Forms and Sample Agreements
Confidentiality Agreement
Memorandum of Association
Contractual Clauses
Jurisdiction Clause
Return Right
German Acts
Patent Act
Trademark Act
Copyright Act
Employee Inventions Law
Competition Act
Teleservices Act
Court Rulings
Patent law
BGH-software-patent
Trademark law
BGH-Bonus2
BGH-ac-pharma
BGH-Blendaxpep
BGH-Acceleration-fee
BGH-Fuenfer
OLGFFM-alcon.de
BGH-LOGO
KG-toolshop
Trademark Orange
ECFI-Aurelia
Competition law
BGH-answer-obligation
BGH-Handy for 0
BVerfG-Benetton
OLG-Celle-anwalt-hannover-de
Computer Law
Mitwohnzent
OLGHH-stockexchangedata
OLGHH-Kulturwerbung.de
BGH-Mitwohnzentrale
BGH-Maxem
BGH-Paperboy
Food law
OLGCelle 13O320aus98
Copyright law
BGH-Urteil-Marlene Dietrich
OLGBS-Beschwerdewert-Auskunft
ECJ-Sony Falcon
Antitrust Law
BGH-Hörgeräteakustik
Employment Law
Attorneys Ethics law
AnwG-Taetigkeitsschwerpunkt
OLGStuttgart-Vanity-Nummer
BVerfG1BvR335aus97
Pharmaceutical Law
Telecommunications Law
inter
Contact
Enquiry
Power of Attorney
Download
Imprint
Privacy Policy
Links
Associations
Official Authorities
Universities
Legal Issues
Miscellaneous
Locations
Berlin
Bielefeld
Bremen
Düsseldorf
Frankfurt
Hamburg
Hanover
Munich
Stuttgart
Vienna

 

horak.
Attorneys at Law Hannover
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Georgstr. 48
30159 Hannover (Headquarter)
Germany
Fon +49 511.35 73 56-0
Fax +49 511.35 73 56-29
info@iprecht.de  
hannover@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Berlin
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Wittestraße 30 K
13509 Berlin
Germany
Fon +49 30.403 66 69-00
Fax +49 30.403 66 69-09
berlin@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Bielefeld
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Herforder Str. 69
33602 Bielefeld
Germany
Fon +49 521.43 06 06-60
Fax +49 521.43 06 06-69
bielefeld@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Bremen
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Parkallee 117
28209 Bremen
Germany
Fon +49 421.33 11 12-90
Fax +49 421.33 11 12-99
bremen@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Düsseldorf
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Grafenberger Allee 293
40237 Düsseldorf
Germany
Fon +49 211.97 26 95-00
Fax +49 211.97 26 95-09
duesseldorf@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Frankfurt/ Main
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Alfred-Herrhausen-Allee 3-5
65760 Frankfurt-Eschborn
Germany
Fon +49 69.380 79 74-20
Fax +49 69.380 79 74-29
frankfurt@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Hamburg
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Colonnaden 5
20354 Hamburg
Germany
Fon +49 40.882 15 83-10
Fax +49 40.882 15 83-19
hamburg@iprecht.de
 
horak. 
Attorneys at Law Munich
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Landsberger Str. 155
80687 Munich
Germany

Fon +49 89.250 07 90-50
Fax +49 89.250 07 90-59
munich@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Stuttgart
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Königstraße 80
70173 Stuttgart
Germany
Fon +49 711.99 58 55-90
Fax +49 711.99 58 55-99
stuttgart@iprecht.de
 
horak. 
Patent Attorneys Vienna
 
Trauttmansdorffgasse 8
1130 Vienna
Austria
Fon +43 1.876 15 17
Fax +49 511.35 73 56-29
vienna@iprecht.de

 

MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION

of....

GENERAL

§ 1

Name and registered domicile of the Company

The Company shall be named xy GmbH.

The Company shall have its registered domicile in Stuttgart.

§ 2

Objects

The objects for which the Company is established are to carry on all or any of the business or businesses of designing, manufacturing and distributing software for computer-assisted robots.

The Company shall be entitled to engaging in all transactions and measures which seem necessary or beneficial for the achievement of the objects of the Company, in particular to founding branches and subsidiaries and to acquiring interests in other enterprises or to establishing other companies.

§ 3

Duration

The Company shall exist for an unlimited period of time starting with the date of registration of the Company in the Commercial Register.

§ 4

Stated capital and capital contributions

The Company’s stated capital shall amount to € 25,500.00.

The following shareholders shall subscribe to the stated capital, which shall be fully paid immediately as follows:

Mr. A.A., graduate engineer, share capital of €8,500.00 as contribution in kind,

Mr. B.B., graduate engineer, share capital of € 8,500.00 as contribution in kind,

Mr. C.C., Master of Business Administration, share capital of € 8,500.00 as cash contribution.

Mr. AA and Mr. BB are the sole shareholders of a company named AA & BB Industrierobotersoftware GbR, which has its registered domicile in Aachen and in which both of them have an equal share participation.

The shareholders AA and BB perform their contribution in kind by means by bringing in their equity interest to the above-mentioned civil law company (GbR). The value of each contribution shall be assumed according to the attached tax balance sheet stating a book value of respectively DM 30,000.00. Out of this sum, DM 17,000.00 shall be charged to each contribution. The remaining amount of DM 13,000.00 shall be booked to the Company as a loan by the contributing shareholder.

The entire company with all its assets and liabilities shall be contributed according to the attached tax balance sheet as of 31st December 1996 and the contract on contribution to capital. The contribution shall be effective from 1st January 1997 00:00 taking into account the additions and decreases in assets occurring since this point in time when the business is run properly. From 1st January 1997 00:00 the Company is run on the account of the shareholders

Shareholder CC shall pay 100% of his cash contributions at par immediately.

§ 5

Obligation to render services

Each shareholder shall, on account of his employment contract, render services for the Company, unless he should be exempted from this obligation by means of a resolution adopted by shareholders.

 EXECUTIVE BODIES

§ 6

Managing directors

The Company shall have one or several managing directors.

The managing directors shall be appointed and removed as well as exempted from the exclusive service clause by the shareholders’ resolution.

§ 7

Powers of representation

If there is only one managing director, the Company shall be solely represented by him. If there are two or several managing directors, the Company shall be represented by joint signatures of two managing directors or joint signatures of a managing director together with a procurist. It is possible to introduce alterations to the power of representation of the managing directors by means of the shareholders’ resolution, in particular it is possible to exempt one or all managing directors from limitations under § 181 of the Civil Code.

The power of representation granted to the managing directors towards third parties shall not be limited due to restrictions with respect to the management board as provided for by law or by the Memorandum of Association.

§ 8

Management

Several managing directors shall be responsible for managing the businesses of the Company unless it is otherwise determined by means of the shareholders’ resolution, in particular those concerning the Company’s internal rules.

Each managing director shall be responsible for managing the Company in compliance with the provisions and restrictions as set forth by law, the Memorandum of Association, the shareholders’ resolutions as well as by the Executive Service Agreement.

In order to carry on any of the businesses exceeding the scope of objects for which the Company was established, the managing directors shall obtain a prior consent by means of the shareholders’ resolution.

§ 9

Shareholders’ resolutions

Resolutions shall be passed by a simple majority of votes cast by all shareholders unless mandatory statutory provisions or the Memorandum of Association provide otherwise.

Resolutions concerning the following issues shall be passed by 75% of votes cast:

any amendments to the Memorandum of Association

dissolution of the Company

resolutions under §§ 6, 7 and 8 of the Memorandum of Association.

The voting right shall be determined in accordance with the share in the stated capital subscribed to – each € 50 of the stated capital subscribed to grant one vote.

Each shareholders’ resolution shall be taken down in the minutes. The minutes shall be signed by the managing directors and the shareholders shall receive a copy thereof.

Lodging an appeal of any kind against a shareholders’ resolution shall be admissible only within one month after the resolution has been passed.

§ 10

Proceedings at shareholders’ meetings

Resolutions of the shareholders shall be passed at a shareholders’ meeting.

A resolution shall be as effective as if the same had been passed at a shareholders’ meeting if all the members for the time being entitled to receive notice and attend and vote at shareholders’ meetings, in the written, oral or other form declare their consent for the resolution to be passed or to the form of the vote. A resolution so passed shall not be effective with respect to any matter required by the law to be solved at a shareholders’ meeting.

Calling a meeting

A shareholders’ meeting shall be called by a managing director. Shareholders’ meetings shall be held at the Company’s corporate seat unless a resolution of the shareholders provides otherwise.

A shareholders’ meeting shall be convened at least once a year to resolve the annual closing of accounts within eight months after the end of a business year. At the abovementioned shareholders’ meeting, decisions shall be made on the audit and approval of the annual closing of the accounts, on the use of the net profits and on the giving of a release to the managing directors. A shareholders’ meeting shall be furthermore convened if it appears to the managing director to be in the interest of the Company or in cases as provided for by the law.

A shareholders’ meeting shall be convened by inviting the shareholders by registered mail which shall be sent to the address last notified to the Company by the respective shareholder of the Company or by means of a delivery of an acknowledgement of receipt. The minimum notice period for convocation is two weeks, counting neither the day of sending the invitations nor the day on which the meeting is held. The invitation shall contain the information on the objects of resolutions to be passed.

If a shareholders’ meeting has not been duly convened, resolutions shall only be passed provided that all the members for the time being entitled to receive notice of and attend and vote at a meeting consent to it.

RULES GOVERNING COMPANY’S FINANCES

§ 11

Business year and annual closing of accounts

The business year shall be the calendar year.

The managing directors shall draft the annual closing of the accounts within the first three months of the business year, unless the law provides for the annual closing of the accounts to be drafted within the first six months of the business year.

§ 12

Distribution of profits

The shareholders shall be entitled to the annual surplus/net income for the respective year exclusive of profit retained, unless the amount has been – by means of a provision contained in Sec.

excluded from being distributed among the shareholders.

Making decisions on the distribution of the profits, the shareholders may retain them in the form of reserves formed out of profits, or bring them forward (accommodated surplus), or decide that the profits shall remain with the Company as a loan on conditions as set forth by a resolution of the shareholders.

The net profits shall be divided in accordance with the capital share.

TRANSFER AND DIVISION OF COMPANY’S SHARES

§ 13

Transfer of shares

The transfer of company shares in whole or in part shall be subject to approval by the shareholders’ meeting passed by a qualified majority of three quarters of the votes cast.

Withdrawal of members

Each shareholder may declare to withdraw from the Company

at any time, if there is an important reason within the meaning of the general company law or

otherwise only six months before the end of a business year, for the first time as of 31st December 1999.

The notice of withdrawal shall take place in the form of a registered mail to the Company.

Expulsion

Each shareholder shall be obligated to withdraw from the Company without his consent,

when and as soon as bankruptcy or conciliation proceedings are started or a petition in bankruptcy is dismissed for insufficiency of assets – immediately,

by a resolution of shareholders – at a point in time determined by the resolution (the shareholder in question does not have the right to cast a vote as far as the resolution is concerned), not before the shareholder concerned has been notified of the resolution

if execution has been imposed on his capital share in the Company and not lifted within a period of two months, or

if an important reason relating to his person has emerged due to which further cooperation with the shareholder in question is unacceptable for the remaining shareholders, or

if the employment relationship of a shareholder, who is obligated under § 5 thereof to render services for the Company, terminates for any reason whatsoever; in the case of death of a shareholder Section (4) thereof shall be applicable.

Death of a shareholder

Heirs or legatees of a shareholder shall be obligated to withdraw from the Company.

Withdrawal proceedings

The withdrawing shareholder or his heirs or legatees shall be obligated to transfer his or their participation in the share in accordance with a resolution passed by the majority of votes cast by the remaining shareholders (the shareholder concerned is not entitled to participate in the vote) to the Company itself, to one or several of its shareholders or to the third party named by the Company, or he shall be obligated to condone the seizure of his participation in the share.

In the case of the seizure of his participation in the share, the withdrawing shareholder or his heirs shall receive from the shareholder (or shareholders) who has acquired his participation in the share a lump sum settlement in accordance with this Memorandum.

§ 14

Settlement

The settlement for a withdrawing shareholder shall be established according to the value determined for the participation in the share, which arises upon application of provisions from the area of fiscal law in order to establish the general value of the participation in the share if it cannot be derived from sales (“Stuttgart procedure”). Such evaluation shall be conducted not later than at the end of the business year in which the shareholder’s notice of withdrawal is delivered to the Company or the exclusory decision is made. If the assessment of the Tax Office should still not be available on the deadline day for evaluation, the evaluation shall be conducted according to the preceding criteria and irrespective of the assessment of the Tax Office. No adjustments due to the later assessment of the Tax Office or due to the company audit shall follow.

The withdrawing shareholder shall be entitled to the part of the profit for the whole business year during which and at the end of which the shareholder is obligated to leave the Company; the part of the profit shall be determined according to the month during which or at the end of which the shareholder submitted the notice of withdrawal to the Company or he made the decision to withdraw.

Any disagreements as far as the amount and the calculation of the settlement are concerned shall be settled – upon filing an application by one of the parties – by a sworn expert of the competent Chamber of Industry and Commerce to the best of his fair judgement within the meaning of §§ 317 ff of the Civil Code. Any expenses incurred in connection with this decision shall be borne half by the withdrawn shareholder and half by the transferee.

The settlement sum shall be paid in five equal annual instalments; the first instalment is due six months after the withdrawal and the following instalments on a yearly basis thereafter. From the first day of the month in which the withdrawing shareholder is no longer entitled to profit under Sec. 2, an annual interest exceeding the Federal Bank’s discount rate by 2% shall be paid on the settlement from the amount still due.

MISCELLANEOUS

§ 15

Prohibition to compete

Each shareholder shall be prohibited from taking on, in addition to the work for this Company, secondary occupations or from engaging in independent enterprises – regardless of kind – without a prior consent by means of shareholders’ resolution in which he is not entitled to vote; above all, he shall be prohibited from doing business on his own or on someone else’s account in the branch of industry of the Company, neither occasionally nor on the recurrent basis, neither indirectly nor directly. Each shareholder shall be excluded from working in the branch of industry of the Company whether as employee, freelancer or in any other form. This prohibition to compete also includes investments of any kind in enterprises of the branch of industry of the Company.

§ 16

Concluding clauses

Any notifications of the Company shall be published only in the German Federal Gazette or in any publishing body acting in its place.

All expenses incurred in connection with the establishing and registration of the Company (commercial register, notifications, consultancies, notary charges) shall be borne by the Company up to the amount of 10% of its nominal capital.

 

ip-attorney-ip-lawyer german law german lawyer patent law patent application file patent lawyer print trademark-law-patent-domain-design-utility-model-europe design law eu design community design law design right international design save law-of-technics-multi-media-law-german-business-lawyerback european-trademark-protection-german-trademarks-european-lawenquiry