Anwalt Deutschland Fachanwalt deutsch German Lawyer Germany English language Attorney-at-law English Lawyer germany french advocat francais allemagneFrench Attorney in Germany spanish language abogado alemania Spanish Attorney/ Lawyer in Germany Italian language avvocatto germania Italian Lawyer/ Attorney Germany Portuguese language advogado Alemanha Portuguese Polish speaking Lawyer/ Attorney in Germany adwokat Niemcy Polish Japanese speaking Lawyer/ Attorney in Germany Bengoshi Doitsu Japanese Attorney/ Lawyer Vietnamese language luat suVietnamese Korean speaking lawyer/ attorney in Germany, EuropeKorean Chinese language Lawyer/ Attorney in Germany/ EuropeChinese Lawyer/ Attorney russian speaking advokat Germaniya Russian


Attorney-at-Law Michael Horak, graduate engineer (Electrical Engineering), LL.M. (European Law) Julia Ziegeler, Attorney-at-law Attorney Umberg, LL.M., M.A. Andree Eckhard, Patent Attorney Katharina Gitmann, Attorney-at-law Karoline Behrend, Attorney-at-law Johanna K. Müller-Kühne, PhD, Patent Attorney Andreas Friedlein, Attorney-at-law John Bühler, Attorney-at-law

Attorneys at law



Locations  Berlin  Bielefeld  Bremen  Düsseldorf  Frankfurt  Hamburg  Hanover  Munich  Stuttgart  Vienna
Overview  Practice  IP Law  Patent Law  Trademark Law  Law Office  Trademark Application  Patent filer  Sample Texts  German Acts  Court Rulings  Contact  Imprint  Privacy Policy  Links
ip attorney germany lawyer attorney law office germany german law european law patent law design law trademark law copyright law german law ip specialist media law music law film law event law entertainment law contracts license agreement draft contract under german law  hannover prosecution infringement patent trade name copyright reseller contract attorney patent law  utility model law unfair competition law anti trust lawyer
file trdaemark application patent application design application lawyer patent trademark attorney trademark searches similiarity search opposition file an infingement suit germany german attorney ip specialist copyright specialist food law plant law patent lawyer domain law internet law it law computer law

patents-trademarks-copyright-europe law lawyer german law german lawyer german attorney trade mark law patent law utility model law design law

ip-lawyer it lawyer attorney for patents trade specialist ip attorney  marks germany european lawyer trademark european community mark ct ect law europen patent office germany representation

ohim euipo representative german patent office munich lawyer germany ip attorney patent lawyer trademark lawyer patent attorney german patent attorney epo eurpean patent office reprsentation law firm european patent german patent austrian patent office intellectual property design lawyer copyright law trademark law patent attorney trademark attorney design attorney

... Start ... Overview ... Court Rulings ... Trademark law ... KG-toolshop

The ruling of the Berlin Court of Appeal of 13th June 2000 (Docket Nr. 5 B 4478/00) – “Toolshop”

Guiding principles:

1. The designation “Toolshop” is purely descriptive and thus subject to a requirement of availability.

2. “Toolshop” in the concrete case would present itself to the target group not as a part of a catalogue, but as a reference to a manufacturer and/or distributor of the goods described. It is possible that the title of the work is ascribed to a certain company if this title is sufficiently known.

3. The fact per se that the consumer adopted the catalogue of a competitor in an unfair manner does not justify judging the exploitation of a similar domain to be a violation of moral principles. There does not exist any right to forbearance within the meaning of § 1 of the Act against Unfair Competition in respect of the domain “”.

Explanatory notes:

This ruling was based on the statement of facts in the preliminary proceedings that the claimant ran a mail-order company trading with certain tools under the designation “Toolshop GbR” with the domain “”. The defendant of the claim ran the domain “” under which he also offered certain tools such as Swiss knives.

The Berlin Court of Appeal answered in the negative to the claim under §§ 15 (4,5) (2) of the Trademark Act because the designation “Toolshop” is of merely descriptive character and because the descriptive character of the chosen name applies also to the foreign-language designation and thus its general acceptance in trade is out of question. Similarly, the Berlin Court of Appeal answered in the negative to the unfair parasitism within the meaning of § 1 of the Act against Unfair Competition.

Persons wanting to use the mere titles of works or corporate designations must be aware of the fact – contrary to the provisions of the Trademark Act – that the question whether trademark protection is going to be granted does not depend on the current registration practice of the Patent Office, but some views of courts are entwined. What would the solution of the case have been if there had existed a registered trademark for “Toolshop”? The Berlin Court of Appeal would most likely not have held that distinctive character was lacking; on the contrary it would have deemed it existent since this had already been examined by the Patent Office.

In order to ensure the consistency of adjudication in the future, the decision-making of the Patent Office with respect to trademark registration, especially to the examination of the absolute grounds for refusal requires a reciprocal examination. Therefore, the Patent Office should take into account the adjudication of the courts on the one hand, and on the other hand, the courts should take into account the registration practice of the Patent Office. This hardly ever happens, though.

© 1998-2021 IP Attorney at law Michael Horak, LL.M, Certified IP Law Specialist

ip-attorney-ip-lawyer german law german lawyer patent law patent application file patent lawyer print trademark-law-patent-domain-design-utility-model-europe design law eu design community design law design right international design save law-of-technics-multi-media-law-german-business-lawyerback european-trademark-protection-german-trademarks-european-lawenquiry